Family LawSupreme
Court Second Petty Bench Decision of July 14, 1995, 49 Minshu 7-2674. The Court
reversed and remanded a paternity suit for retrial. The alleged natural father of the
child had brought an action for a declaration of no parental relationship against the
child and the man listed as the child's father on the family registry. At the time the
suit was brought, third party special adoption proceedings were underway with respect to
the child, and the magistrate supervising the adoption case understood this fact. The
Court recognized a necessity for a retrial, recognizing that the plaintiffs claims
were meritorious as the relationship with the natural father is important in demonstrating
the elements and effectiveness of special adoption proceedings.
Supreme Court Second Petty Bench Decision of January 26, 1996, 50 Minshu
1-132, 1559 Hanji 43, 903 Hanta 104. The Court dismissed a lower court
determination. In this case, a relative of the defendant had died leaving a will
indicating a desire to leave everything to the defendant, including the property, which is
the subject of this action. At that point, the defendant accomplished title registration
of the property. The plaintiff claimed title to 1/24 of the property of the decedent and
expressed a desire for division of the property. For the purposes of transferring
ownership of 1/24 of the subject property, the plaintiff instituted suit for transfer in
title registration of 1/24 of the subject property. The trial court found for the
defendant, and the Appeals Court reversed. Both decisions revolved around the
determination of the expression of intent of the decedent. Where a decedent has merely
expressed and intent for a division of property as opposed to an heir receiving under a
will, where the partial heir has demanded the property be reserved, that demand has to
wait until after transfer of the property to the recipient under the will and can not pick
and choose amongst the assets making up the transferred property.